High-Stiffness 3D Tissue Models Enabled by PCL–GelMA Hybrid Bioprinting

PCL格子構造内に封入されたMSCを示す蛍光画像。生細胞(緑)がGelMA内部に均一に分布し、細胞が伸展している様子が確認できる。
             

PCL–GelMA Hybrid Bioprinting: Engineering High-Stiffness 3D Tissue Models with the BIO X

Introduction: Challenges in Tissue Engineering and the Hybrid Approach

Designing scaffolds that provide both high mechanical strength and a biologically supportive environment for cell attachment remains a central challenge in tissue engineering.
Single-material scaffolds often force a trade-off—mechanically strong materials tend to be less cytocompatible, while biologically favorable materials often lack structural integrity.

The BIO X platform from CELLINK overcomes this limitation through hybrid bioprinting, combining PCL (poly(ε-caprolactone)), a thermoplastic polymer with high stiffness, and GelMA (gelatin methacryloyl), a photocrosslinkable hydrogel with excellent biocompatibility.
This approach enables the fabrication of 3D tissue models that simultaneously achieve structural stability and a cell-friendly microenvironment.

Technical Highlights

1. Hybrid Structures Combining PCL Frames and GelMA Hydrogels

The workflow below illustrates the complete hybrid printing process using the BIO X, including PCL extrusion, GelMA dispensing, photocrosslinking, culture, and evaluation.

Workflow of PCL–GelMA hybrid bioprinting using the BIO X, showing PCL printing, GelMA dispensing, photocrosslinking, culture, and evaluation.
Figure 1 | Workflow of PCL–GelMA hybrid scaffold fabrication.

Using both the Thermoplastic Printhead (TPPH) and the Temperature-controlled Printhead (TCPH),
the BIO X can precisely print PCL lattice structures and simultaneously deposit cell-laden GelMA within the voids, forming a fully integrated hybrid scaffold.

2. PCL Lattice Structures with Tunable Void Sizes

Comparison of 3D-printed PCL lattice structures with 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm filament spacing.
Figure 2 | Comparison of PCL lattice void sizes (0.5 mm / 1.0 mm).

By adjusting the spacing of the PCL lattice, the overall mechanical properties—particularly stiffness—can be tuned to match the requirements of specific tissue types.

3. Compressive Modulus: Mechanical Performance of the Hybrid Scaffold

Compressive modulus of PCL–GelMA hybrid scaffolds, showing approximately 3.2 MPa for 1.0 mm spacing and 4.9 MPa for 0.5 mm spacing.
Figure 6 | Compressive modulus of PCL–GelMA hybrid scaffolds.

The 1.0 mm lattice produced a modulus of approximately 3.2 MPa, while the 0.5 mm lattice achieved about 4.9 MPa.
These values correspond closely to the stiffness of native soft tissues such as nasal and articular cartilage, demonstrating the ability to tune mechanics through lattice design alone.

4. MSC Proliferation Within the Hybrid Scaffold

Bar graph showing MSC proliferation from Day 7 to Day 14 in 0.5 mm and 1.0 mm PCL lattice scaffolds.
Figure 5 | MSC proliferation within the PCL–GelMA hybrid scaffold.

Over 14 days of culture, cell numbers increased substantially—approximately 4.5-fold in the 1.0 mm lattice and 6.1-fold in the 0.5 mm lattice—indicating a supportive environment for long-term cell growth.

5. Cell Viability and Morphology: Live/Dead Fluorescent Imaging

Fluorescent Live/Dead imaging showing viable MSCs (green) and nuclei (blue), distributed throughout the PCL–GelMA hybrid scaffold.
Figure 4 | MSC viability and morphology within the hybrid scaffold.

Viable MSCs (green) were uniformly distributed throughout the GelMA and along the PCL frame. Cells exhibited increasing spreading over time, confirming the cytocompatibility of the hybrid fabrication process.

6. MSC Viability (Day 7 / Day 14)

Bar graph comparing MSC viability across three scaffold conditions at Day 7 and Day 14, showing consistently high viability of 89–95%.
Figure 3 | MSC viability within the PCL–GelMA hybrid scaffold.

Both Day 7 and Day 14 demonstrated consistently high viability of approximately 90%, confirming that photocrosslinking and the overall fabrication workflow remain highly cell-friendly.

Applications: Cartilage, Neural Models, and Beyond

The hybrid approach provides tunable mechanical performance, biological compatibility, and structural flexibility,
enabling applications in cartilage tissue models, nerve guide conduits, connective tissue engineering, and other advanced 3D biological constructs.

Conclusion

PCL–GelMA hybrid bioprinting with the BIO X enables the creation of next-generation 3D tissue models that combine high structural stiffness with excellent cytocompatibility.
This technology shows strong promise for future applications in regenerative medicine, tissue engineering, and biofabrication research.


コメントは閉じられています。